There are problems and then there are crises. It’s certainly a problem that in the next few years, US federal government debt is projected to surpass its World War II-era peak.
But US sovereign debt is unlikely to become a crisis, according to a paper released last week by economists at the Brookings Institution, a think tank. By “crisis” they mean “a sudden, large and sustained downturn in demand for Treasury securities.” The paper lays out four scenarios in which that could happen, and concludes that none of them is likely:
- A big holder of Treasuries (like China) could abruptly start selling. Even China holds just 3% of outstanding US debt and a selloff wouldn’t necessarily change other investors’ view on the value of Treasuries.
- The US could fail to raise its debt ceiling. If that happened, it might not last long — since market turmoil would prompt Congress to reconsider — plus the Fed and Treasury could temporarily calm markets.
- The Fed — presumably under duress — could signal it’s willing to tolerate higher inflation to lower the value of US debt. The authors argue this simply wouldn’t work since so much US debt is short-term and would quickly need to be rolled over at higher interest rates.
- The US could decide that default was its best option. Again, the authors think this option — a “strategic default” — is unlikely because it wouldn’t solve much. It would hurt US investors, who own 70% of US federal debt, and would make new borrowing near impossible.
Instead of a crisis, the researchers see US debt as an ongoing and “ever-larger transfer of consumption from future generations to current generations.”
In theory, it’s solvable if the US cuts spending and/or raises taxes closer to the OECD average. But during an online event about the paper, David Wessel, a senior fellow at Brookings, noted a line that he said had been “haunting him.”
The chance of a debt crisis was low, the authors wrote, “so long as the US retains its strong institutions and a fiscal trajectory that isn’t vastly worse than the one currently projected.”
“There are things I used to assign a zero probability to that are now somewhat higher,” Wessel commented, and that list includes a weakening of US institutions and a worse fiscal trajectory.
The upshot of that concern, says Louise Sheiner, also a senior fellow at Brookings and one of the paper’s authors, is that the chance of a debt crisis is “not related to how much debt we have.” Instead, she says, “The kinds of things we’re worried about — [like] not following the law as we used to understand it — [we’d be] worried about that even if we had no debt.” |
More misdirection from the ministry of truth. Perhaps it’s the mRNA injections and toxic vaccine overload that are causing Gen Z’s neurological problems…..
Noise-cancelling headphones may be linked to rise in Gen Z neurological problems, experts fear
Cases of what is known as auditory processing disorder are increasing among young people
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/16/noise-cancel-headphones-link-hearing-brain-problems-gen-z/
Just like five years ago, ten years ago, even though the national debt is all time high and everyone thinks a crash is coming, they can and probably will just keep increasing that national debt and amp up the money printers. It can triple from here with minimal problems, so why not…
So, is Sheiner indicating a Constitutional Crisis? The real thing could cause shock waves in the financial markets. A confidence issue for bonds, etc.
“The kinds of things we’re worried about — [like] not following the law as we used to understand it — [we’d be] worried about that even if we had no debt.” – Louise Sheiner
I wonder how she used to understand the law and when. Sounds like legal change is coming.
I think she’s referring to what we’re observing with Trump.
So far, Trump hasn’t really done anything unconstitutional, per se, but I think she’s observing what we’re observing and wondering the same thing.
Trump says he’ll abide by whatever the courts say, and until then, he can largely try anything he thinks he can get away with. The same went on with Obama with his programmes as well as with Biden. All the presidents push it until the courts overturn.
The moment Trump says he will disregard court rulings is the moment we sell all UST holdings.